Buildings burning during the May 2023 outbreak of ethnic violence in Manipur, crowd watching in the foreground

What Was Allowed
to Happen
in Manipur.

Three years. Two communities. One state that had the men, the arms, and the time to stop this — and didn't.

Scroll for the record
0 dead, official count (Nov 2024)
0 displaced from their homes
0 weapons looted from police armouries
0 years and counting

No single riot did this. Three years of nobody stopping it did.

II

The Flashpoints

No single day. A chain of moments where someone should have stepped in — and didn't.

May 3, 2023
The spark

A court order. A march. Then it didn't stop.

A High Court order on tribal status triggered a solidarity march. The march met counter-mobilisation. By nightfall, Manipur was burning — and three years later, it still hasn't fully stopped.

Source: Wikipedia — 2023–2026 Manipur conflict, citing contemporaneous reporting

May 4, 2023

Twenty guards. Six thousand guns gone by morning.

A mob broke into the Manipur Police Training Centre at Pangei. Twenty guards, outnumbered, fired blank rounds and were overrun. Roughly 6,000 firearms were looted from armouries statewide in the days that followed. More than half are still missing.

Source: ThePrint — reporting on armoury looting, 2023–2025

May 3–4, 2023

Two women reached a police van. They were left to the mob.

According to the CBI's own charge sheet, two Kuki-Zo women who would later be paraded naked and assaulted had first reached a police vehicle and asked to be driven to safety. They were told it wasn't possible, and left. What happened next was filmed.

Source: The Wire, reporting on CBI charge sheet — April 2024

July 19, 2023
The turn

The video was 2 months old before the country saw it

The footage of the assault took over two months to surface nationally — partly due to an internet shutdown in Manipur that rights groups widely criticised. Arrests followed only after the video went viral, not after the original police complaint. Parliament was disrupted for three days demanding a response.

What was said

Coverage largely began and ended with outrage at the video itself — a single, shocking clip standing in for the story.

What was left out

The men in the footage were identifiable from day one. It was the internet shutdown and institutional inertia — not lack of evidence — that delayed any response for months.

Source: BBC; CNN — July 2023

Through 2023–24

CCTV shows uniformed police setting fires

Footage from January 2024 implicated Manipur Police commandos and members of a Meitei vigilante group in the arson of homes, a school, and a church hall in Moreh. Witnesses said a central paramilitary force stood by while it happened. Rights groups documented a broader pattern: armed vigilante outfits operating for months with little to no consequence.

Source: Newsreel Asia, citing CCTV footage and local reporting

February 2025

The Chief Minister resigns. Delhi takes direct control.

Facing a no-confidence motion after 20 months of intermittent violence, Chief Minister N. Biren Singh resigned. President's Rule was imposed days later — the Union government took direct charge of a state its own police force could no longer be trusted to run.

Source: Wikipedia — 2023–2026 Manipur conflict

August 2025
The finding

"Not spontaneous — planned, and facilitated by state failures"

A 694-page independent tribunal report, led by former Supreme Court judge Justice Kurian Joseph, concluded the violence was planned and ethnically targeted — enabled by state failure. FIRs were filed selectively. Investigations were delayed. Security forces were accused of active complicity. Both state and central governments were indicted for "enabling impunity."

Source: The Wire, reporting on the PUCL Independent People's Tribunal — August 2025

February 2026

President's Rule lifted. A new government sworn in.

Almost exactly a year after direct central rule began, it ended — a new Chief Minister took office and Manipur's elected government was restored. The conflict was not resolved when this happened; it was still active.

Source: Wikipedia — 2023–2026 Manipur conflict

2026 — Present
Still unresolved

Drone attacks, bombings, and weapons still missing

By mid-2026, militant groups had escalated to coordinated drone strikes near the Myanmar border. A bomb attack in April killed two children in their home. Most of the ~6,000 weapons looted in 2023 are still unaccounted for. The government's own Commission of Inquiry has had its deadline pushed back repeatedly — most recently to November 2026.

What gets covered

Each new incident is reported as an isolated flare-up — a bombing here, a clash there.

What's missing

The throughline: the same unrecovered weapons, the same stalled inquiry, the same institutional gap — three years running.

Source: Eurasia Review, South Asia Terrorism Portal data — May 2026

Every entry above has a rule attached to it. The state wrote the rule. The state broke it.

III

The Standard, and Who Failed It

Five obligations the state was bound to. Then, point by point, where the record shows they weren't met.

01

Protect life, regardless of community.

The state's most basic obligation — security forces exist to stop violence, not to pick a side in it.

02

Secure the armouries.

Police weapons cannot become the conflict's weapons. That line failed on day two.

03

File the complaint. Every time, without delay.

An FIR is the starting point for justice. Selectively filing them is a choice, not an oversight.

04

No armed group operates above the law.

Vigilante militias functioning for months with impunity is a state choosing not to act.

05

Silence has a cost.

A response delayed for months, made only after public outrage forces it, is itself a form of failure.

Where the State Failed

Breaks Rule 02

Twenty guards, thousands of weapons, no real resistance

Roughly 6,000 firearms were taken from state armouries within days of the outbreak. More than half remain unrecovered three years later. Those looted weapons are cited by security officials as the reason the conflict escalated from riots to sustained armed violence.

Source: ThePrint, The Wire — 2023–2025

Breaks Rules 01 & 03

Police turned away women who asked for protection

The CBI's own charge sheet states two women were left by police who declined to drive them to safety — hours before they were assaulted on camera. This was not absence. It was a decision made in the moment.

Source: The Wire, reporting on CBI charge sheet — 2024

Breaks Rule 04

Uniformed personnel filmed setting fires, allegedly alongside a militia

CCTV from January 2024 showed individuals believed to be police commandos and Meitei vigilante group members burning homes and a church hall — while a central paramilitary force reportedly stood by. Both the vigilante activity and the standing-by are failures of the same rule.

Source: Newsreel Asia — 2024

Breaks Rule 03

An independent tribunal called it "planned," not spontaneous

A 694-page report led by a former Supreme Court judge found FIRs were filed selectively, investigations were delayed, and security forces faced credible accusations of active complicity — not just negligence.

Source: PUCL Independent People's Tribunal, via The Wire — 2025

Add your source

EDIT: Add a further documented failure here

Drop your sourced account here — link or citation. Balance across communities where the record supports it.

Source: — add citation —

Three years. 258 dead. 60,000 displaced. Most of six thousand stolen weapons still out there — and an inquiry that keeps getting pushed back.

Protester holding a sign reading 'Cry My Beloved Country, Cry!' at a demonstration

"Cry my beloved country, cry" — that's not our line. That's what someone had to write on cardboard because no one else would say it for them. That's the whole point.

The mark in your tab

A flag most people scroll past.

Yellow, dark blue, red, and green — this exact four-stripe banner has circulated for years as an unofficial symbol tied to Meitei and hill-tribe coalition sentiment. It has never been an official state flag, and vexillological records themselves describe it as more of a claim than a settled emblem — a flag for what some hoped Manipur could still be, not a government banner.

It's used here at the size of a browser tab, on purpose. Not a banner to rally behind — a small, easy-to-miss reminder that the idea of one shared Manipur still has people willing to claim it.